BAT Awards
    1941/23
    04 nov 2025
    Milović vs. Žensko Košarkarsko Društvo Ježica
    The Slovenian Coach, Predrag Milović, filed a claim against the Slovenian Club, Žensko Košarkarsko Društvo Ježica, for unpaid salary and interest. In accordance with Article 16.2 of the BAT Rules, the Arbitrator issued an award without reasons.
    Documentos relacionados
    ncv5fej66jy1gywyqpyu.pdf
    1943/23
    04 nov 2025
    Dolezaj vs. Iraklis Basketball Club
    The Slovakian Player, Marek Dolezaj, filed a claim against the Greek Club, Iraklis Basketball Club, for unpaid salary and interest. In accordance with Article 16.2 of the BAT Rules, the Arbitrator issued an award without reasons.
    Documentos relacionados
    bbx7soc5iveiachkwmv5.pdf
    1935/23
    04 nov 2025
    Zoroski vs. Frazier
    The Serbian Agent, Ivan Zoroski, filed a claim against the American Player, Trenton Jamar Frazier, for unpaid agent fees and interest. The Claimant argued that due to the Respondent’s early termination of the Agreement, the Claimant would be entitled to 10% of the total value of any contract signed by the Respondent during the original term of the Agreement. The Respondent accepted to be liable to pay 10% of the value of any contract signed before 11 February 2023, i.e. the date of effective termination of the Agreement, but argued not to be bound by any payment obligation provided in the Agreement as of 11 February 2023. The claim was partially upheld.
    Documentos relacionados
    d4v18cmehgvaksz1y59c.pdf
    1937/23
    04 nov 2025
    Takianos vs. Apollon Limassol Basketball Ltd.
    The Greek Coach, Fotios Takianos, filed a claim against the Cypriot Club, Apollon Limassol Basketball Ltd., for unpaid salaries, bonus and interest. In accordance with Article 16.2 of the BAT Rules, the Arbitrator issued an award without reasons.
    Documentos relacionados
    vw68psnkzxmvtsxb7n6p.pdf
    1914/23
    04 nov 2025
    Wasserman Media Group LLC vs. Hilliard
    The American Agency, Wasserman Media Group LLC, filed a claim against the American Player, Darrun Hilliard, for unpaid agency fees and interest. It remained undisputed between the Parties that the Player owes the Agency a compensation for the early termination of the Agency Contract. However, the Claimant argued that the Player owes an agency fee of 10% of the Player’s gross salary with his new club. By contrast, the Respondent argued that awarding 10% of the Player’s gross salary would lead to an intrinsically unfair and unjust result, as he only received the net amounts from his new Club. The claim was upheld.
    Documentos relacionados
    e8dhjevrw5atkyemlpbr.pdf
    1915/23
    04 nov 2025
    Dzeletovic vs. Vsl “SSK” (BC Pieno Zvaigzdes)
    The Serbian Player, Dorde Dzeletovic, filed a claim against the Lithuanian Club, Vsl SSK (BC Pieno Zvaigzdes), for unpaid salary, adjoining taxes as well as social contributions, damages and interest. The Claimant argued that the Respondent’s termination of the Contract was unlawful, since the Claimant was entitled to refuse to return to the Respondent due to the Respondent’s shortcomings and failures regarding its obligation to obtain the relevant visa and permits for the Claimant. The Respondent argued that the termination of the Contract was with just cause as the Claimant unexpectedly and without reason left Lithuania missing practices and matches, as well as unreasonably and arbitrarily failed to return. Therefore, the Respondent requested payment of a special indemnity from the Claimant by way of a counterclaim. The claim was partially upheld, the counterclaim was fully rejected.
    Documentos relacionados
    e4xkdlzqe4mbhmucyoj0.pdf
    1916/23
    04 nov 2025
    Gherdan vs. Izmit Belediyespor Gençlik Kulübü Derneği
    The Romanian Agent, Sergiu Valentin Gherdan, filed a claim against the Turkish Club, Izmit Belediyespor Gençlik Kulübü Derneği, for unpaid agent fees, penalty and interest. In accordance with Article 16.2 of the BAT Rules, the Arbitrator issued an award without reasons.
    Documentos relacionados
    o10pvq5o73sqpgdnxoqm.pdf
    1923/23
    04 nov 2025
    Gherdan vs. AKA Management GmbH, BC Alte Kanti Aarau
    The Romanian Agent, Sergiu Valentin Gherdan, filed a claim against the Swiss Club, BC Alte Kanti Aarau, and the Swiss Company, AKA Management GmbH, for unpaid agent fees and interest. In accordance with Article 16.2 of the BAT Rules, the Arbitrator issued an award without reasons.
    Documentos relacionados
    wgztr5rbkhjmd9u9wbn4.pdf
    1919/23
    04 nov 2025
    Inception Sports LLC vs. Ervin
    The American Agency, Inception Sports LLC, filed a claim against the American Player, Carlbe Lee Ervin, for unpaid agency fees and interest. The Claimant argued that the Respondent shall pay to simply seek to assert its express contractual right to a 10% fee of the Respondent’s engagement by a new club, for which the BAT has jurisdiction and FIBA regulations do not supersede the contents of contractual obligations. The Respondent challenged the BAT’s jurisdiction and denied any payment obligation due to alleged duress exercised by the Claimant with regard to the conclusion of the Contract. The claims were fully upheld.
    Documentos relacionados
    lij0793a7stykhn7wztq.pdf
    1925/23
    04 nov 2025
    Evans vs. Galatasaray Spor Kulübü Dernegi
    The American-Slovenian Player, Shante Marie Evans, filed a claim against the Turkish Club, Galatasaray Spor Kulübü Dernegi, for unpaid salary, issuance of a tax certificate and interest. The Claimant argued that the Respondent failed to pay her the full contractually owed salary although she has fully complied with the contractual obligations. The Respondent acknowledged that it owed the requested salary amounts but argued that awarding default interest would be unfair, as it only failed to make the requested salary payments due to the economic crises in Turkey and the Turkish Lira depreciating significantly against the Euro. In addition, the Respondent argued that the Claimant’s toll debt incurred by using the Respondent’s car must be deducted from the amounts awarded to the Claimant. The claims were fully upheld.
    Documentos relacionados
    s6eluo8qypebj42yjwhe.pdf